ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Application of Parallel Reaction Monitoring to the Development and Validation of a Quantitative Assay for ST-246 in Human Plasma.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic Analysis of Plasma Exosomes Enables the Identification of Lung Cancer in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- The life motto of a young researcher: follow your dreams.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we developed and validated a robust and sensitive method of liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry in parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mode for ST-246 (tecovirimat) quantification in human blood plasma. The method was compared with the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) technique and showed better selectivity and similar sensitivity in a wider concentration range (10-5000 ng/mL). Within this range, intra- and interday variability of precision and accuracy were within acceptable ranges in accordance with the European Medicines Agency guidelines, and recovery was 87.9-100.6%. Samples were stable at 4 °C within 48 h and at -20 °C up to 3 months. The recovery and matrix effects in the proposed HRMS method were about 5% higher than those reported for the MRM method, but the PRM method showed better accuracy with comparable precision. It was found that the ST-246 concentration shown by the PRM method is approximately 24% higher than the output of the MRM one. Nonetheless, the high selectivity with similar sensitivity, as compared with traditional MRM methods, makes the proposed approach attractive for research and clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.