Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887247›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Prediction of Response to Cisplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients by Molecular Subtyping including KRT and FGFR Target Gene Assessment.

Thorsten H Ecke, Paula Carolin Voß, Thorsten Schlomm, Anja Rabien, Frank Friedersdorff, Dimitri Barski, Thomas Otto, Michael Waldner, Elke Veltrup, Friederike Linden and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mechanistic study ofTranslational andrology and urology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thorsten H EckeDepartment of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-2763
Paula Carolin VoßDepartment of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten SchlommDepartment of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Anja RabienDepartment of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-4878
Frank FriedersdorffDepartment of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Dimitri BarskiDepartment of Urology, Rheinlandklinikum, 41464 Neuss, Germany.
Thomas OttoDepartment of Urology, Rheinlandklinikum, 41464 Neuss, Germany.
Michael WaldnerDepartment of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Elke VeltrupSTRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Friederike LindenSTRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Roland HakeInstitute of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian EidtInstitute of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Jenny RoggischInstitute of Pathology, Helios Hospital, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, Universitäsklinikum Köln, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Constantin RiegerDepartment of Urology, Universitäsklinikum Köln, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Lucas KastnerDepartment of Urology, Universitäsklinikum Köln, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Steffen HallmannDepartment of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.
Stefan KochInstitute of Pathology, Helios Hospital, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.
Ralph M WirtzSTRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEHelios Hospital Bad Saarow · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEKlinikum Rheine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma achieving pathological complete response (pCR) upon neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have improved prognosis. Molecular subtypes of bladder cancer differ markedly regarding sensitivity to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and harbor FGFR treatment targets to various content. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative assessment of molecular subtype as well as FGFR target gene expression is predictive for therapeutic outcome—rate of ypT0 status—to justify subsequent prospective validation within the “BladderBRIDGister”. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens from transurethral bladder tumor resections (TUR) prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and corresponding radical cystectomy samples after chemotherapy of 36 patients were retrospectively collected. RNA from FFPE tissues were extracted by commercial kits, Relative gene expression of subtyping markers (e.g., KRT5, KRT20) and target genes (FGFR1, FGFR3) was analyzed by standardized RT-qPCR systems (STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne). Spearman correlation, Kruskal−Wallis, Mann−Whitney and sensitivity/specificity tests were performed by JMP 9.0.0 (SAS software). The neoadjuvant cohort consisted of 36 patients (median age: 69, male 83% vs. female 17%) with 92% of patients being node-negative during radical cystectomy after 1 to 4 cycles of NAC. When comparing pretreatment with post-treatment samples, the median expression of KRT20 dropped most significantly from DCT 37.38 to 30.65, which compares with a 128-fold decrease. The reduction in gene expression was modest for other luminal marker genes (GATA3 6.8-fold, ERBB2 6.3-fold). In contrast, FGFR1 mRNA expression increased from 33.28 to 35.88 (~6.8-fold increase). Spearman correlation revealed positive association of pretreatment KRT20 mRNA levels with achieving pCR (r = 0.3072: p = 0.0684), whereas pretreatment FGFR1 mRNA was associated with resistance to chemotherapy (r = −0.6418: p < 0.0001). Hierarchical clustering identified luminal tumors of high KRT20 mRNA expression being associated with high pCR rate (10/16; 63%), while the double-negative subgroup with high FGFR1 expression did not respond with pCR (0/9; 0%). Molecular subtyping distinguishes patients with high probability of response from tumors as resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Targeting FGFR1 in less-differentiated bladder cancer subgroups may sensitize tumors for adopted treatments or subsequent chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedCisplatinFemaleHumansMaleMusclesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesRNA, MessengerCisplatinRNA, Messengerbladder cancerFGFR1FGFR3KRT20KRT5neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35887247
PMCPMC9323197
OpenAlexW4285729792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.