Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35887164›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Are We Ready to Implement Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer in Clinical Practice? Part 1: General Issues and Marker Expression.

Francesca Sanguedolce, Magda Zanelli, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Maurizio Zizzo, Giorgia Cocco, Lars Björnebo, Anna Lantz, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Luigi Cormio and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesca SanguedolcePathology Unit, Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Magda ZanelliPathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-9933
Andrea PalicelliPathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2299-5160
Stefano AscaniPathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Maurizio ZizzoSurgical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-7856
Giorgia CoccoRadiotherapy Unit, Policlinico Riuniti, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Lars BjörneboDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Solna, Sweden.
Anna LantzDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Solna, Sweden.
Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-3005
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with highly variable clinical and pathological features, and resulting in different outcomes. Such heterogeneity ensues from distinct pathogenetic mechanisms and may consistently affect treatment responses in single patients. Thus, over the last few years, several groups have developed molecular classification schemes for BC, mainly based on their mRNA expression profiles. A "consensus" classification has recently been proposed to combine the published systems, agreeing on a six-cluster scheme with distinct prognostic and predictive features. In order to implement molecular subtyping as a risk-stratification tool in routine practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been explored as a readily accessible, relatively inexpensive, standardized surrogate method, achieving promising results in different clinical settings. The first part of this review deals with the steps resulting in the development of a molecular subtyping of BC, its prognostic and predictive implications, and the main features of immunohistochemical markers used as surrogates to stratify BC into pre-defined molecular clusters.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunohistochemistryBiomarkers, Tumorbladder cancerimmunohistochemistrymolecular classification

Identifiers

PMID35887164
PMCPMC9319819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.