Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886794›Full record

ReviewInsects2022

REDfly: An Integrated Knowledgebase for Insect Regulatory Genomics.

Soile V E Keränen, Angel Villahoz-Baleta, Andrew E Bruno, Marc S Halfon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Flexibility and sensitivity in gene regulation out of equilibrium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soile V E KeränenIndependent Research, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA.
Angel Villahoz-BaletaCenter for Computational Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Andrew E BrunoCenter for Computational Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Marc S HalfonNew York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-2705

Funding

REDfly: The regulatory sequence resource for Drosophila and other insectsU24GM142435 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HALFON, MARC S · 2021 to 2023
$1.4M
REDfly: The regulatory sequence resource for Drosophila and other insectsR01GM114067 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HALFON, MARC S · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Acquisition of High Performance Data and Computing Infrastructure to Advance Biomedical ResearchS10OD024973 · OD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI FURLANI, THOMAS · 2019 to 2019
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114067NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM142435NIH HHS R01 GM 114067NIH HHS S10 OD024973NIH HHS S10OD024973NIH HHS U24 GM142435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide here an updated description of the REDfly (Regulatory Element Database for Fly) database of transcriptional regulatory elements, a unique resource that provides regulatory annotation for the genome of

Indexed as

cis-regulatory moduleDrosophilaenhancergene regulationgenome annotationinsectsregulatory genomics

Identifiers

PMID35886794
PMCPMC9323752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.