Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886792›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

The Use of "Tail-Pedometers" to Evaluate the Impact of Dipterans in Feeder Cattle.

Marc Desquesnes, Kornkanok Thaisungnoen, Piangjai Chalermwong, Adèle Nevot, Clément Fossaert, Antoine Lucas, Sathaporn Onju, Phoompong Boonsaen, Sathaporn Jittapalapong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Detection ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc DesquesnesCIRAD, UMR InterTryp, ENVT, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-2422
Kornkanok ThaisungnoenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Piangjai ChalermwongFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Adèle NevotInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Clément FossaertInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Antoine LucasInterTryp, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Sathaporn OnjuDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen 73140, Thailand.
Phoompong BoonsaenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen 73140, Thailand.
Sathaporn JittapalapongFaculty of Veterinary Technologies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Kasetsart University · THCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FR

Funding

Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) ANR-15-CE35-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematophagous flies are a pest for livestock; their direct impact reduces productivity, and they are vectors of parasites, bacteria and viruses. Their control using insecticides is inefficient and highly polluting. The validation of new control tools requires efficacy and cost-effectiveness evaluation. The quantification of hematophagous insects' impact in livestock is a challenging prerequisite. Tail flicks counts can reliably evaluate fly-burden; however, visual records are tedious and time-consuming. In the present study, automation of tail flick counts was made through the use of pedometers attached to the tail, in two groups of feeder cattle. Group A was kept in a pen under the protection of a mosquito net, and Group B was kept in an open-air pen. The fly density of Group B was evaluated using fly traps. The apparent density per trap ranged from 130 to 1700 in the study. The mean pedometer records per 24 h ranged from 957+/-58 bits in Group A to 11,138+/-705 bits in Group B. The night/day records observed in Group A (200/800 bits) were drastically increased in Group B (1000-4000/4000-14,000 bits) and variable along seasons. A very high correlation was observed between fly density and visual records or pedometer records (PR). Two-hour PRs proved to be a reliable predictive tool for fly density. Moreover, the pedometers revealed an unsuspected but significant nuisance of mosquitoes, which should be thoroughly investigated.

Indexed as

defense movementseconomic lossmosquitoesStomoxystabanidstail flicks

Identifiers

PMID35886792
PMCPMC9320480
OpenAlexW4284885042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.