ArticleInsects2022
Systematic Functional Annotation Workflow for Insects.
Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome assembly and annotation of the naked mole rat Heterocephalus glaber reared in Japan.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Functional Annotation Workflow for Fungal Transcriptomes.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive expression data for two honey bee species, Apis mellifera and Apis cerana japonica.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Genome Editing and Bioinformatics: Addressing Challenges in Genome Editing Implementation and Genome Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Bovine, Porcine, and Sheep Muscle Using Interpretable Machine Learning Models.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Search for Gene Mutations Likely Conferring Insecticide Resistance in the Common Bed Bug,Insects · 2024Article
- Long-read genome assembly of the Japanese parasitic wasp Copidosoma floridanum (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Time-course transcriptome data of silk glands in day 0-7 last-instar larvae of Bombyx mori (w1 pnd strain).Scientific data · 2024Article
- A highly contiguous genome assembly of red perilla (Perilla frutescens) domesticated in Japan.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023Article
- Reference Genome Sequences of the Oriental Armyworm,Insects · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing has revolutionized entomological study, rendering it possible to analyze the genomes and transcriptomes of non-model insects. However, use of this technology is often limited to obtaining the nucleotide sequences of target or related genes, with many of the acquired sequences remaining unused because other available sequences are not sufficiently annotated. To address this issue, we have developed a functional annotation workflow for transcriptome-sequenced insects to determine transcript descriptions, which represents a significant improvement over the previous method (functional annotation pipeline for insects). The developed workflow attempts to annotate not only the protein sequences obtained from transcriptome analysis but also the ncRNA sequences obtained simultaneously. In addition, the workflow integrates the expression-level information obtained from transcriptome sequencing for application as functional annotation information. Using the workflow, functional annotation was performed on the sequences obtained from transcriptome sequencing of the stick insect (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.