Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886496›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effect of N95 Respirator on Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Physiologic Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kampanat Wangsan, Ratana Sapbamrer, Wachiranun Sirikul, Jinjuta Panumasvivat, Vithawat Surawattanasakul, Pheerasak Assavanopakun

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kampanat WangsanDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4657-4515
Ratana SapbamrerDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0379-2798
Wachiranun SirikulDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-4582
Jinjuta PanumasvivatDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0479-4923
Vithawat SurawattanasakulDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pheerasak AssavanopakunDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-5585
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 respirators were commonly used in many situations. Respiratory problems from prolonged use of respirators were discussed in many studies, which show varied results. From the inconclusive results, the current systematic review and meta-analysis discerned the effects of the N95 respirator by assessing the oxygen and carbon dioxide changes in both high- and low-to-moderate-intensity physical activities in a healthy population. Thirteen studies were identified for inclusion in the study. In high-intensity physical activities, our meta-analysis showed borderline lower oxygen saturation and higher carbon dioxide partial pressure, but oxygen saturation did not change in low-to-moderate physical activity. The use of N95 respirators could statistically affect the physiologic changes of carbon dioxide and oxygen in high-intensity physical activity among healthy participants, but this may not be clinically significant. Some users who have certain health conditions, such as respiratory problems, should be informed of the clinical symptoms related to hypercarbia and hypoxia for the early detection of adverse effects of N95 respirators.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Protective DevicesCarbon DioxideHumansN95 RespiratorsOxygenPandemicsCarbon DioxideOxygencarbon dioxideN95oxygen saturationphysical activityphysical workloadrespiratorrespiratory physiologic responserespiratory protection equipment

Identifiers

PMID35886496
PMCPMC9316293
OpenAlexW4285733460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.