Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886418›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Different Educational Interventions on Individual Cognition of Garbage Classification Based on EEG Monitoring.

Rui Zhao, Xinyun Ren, Yan Liu, Yujun Li, Ruyin Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui ZhaoFaculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China.
Xinyun RenFaculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China.
Yan LiuFaculty of Geoscience and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China.
Yujun LiDepartment of Foreign Language and Culture, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China.
Ruyin LongSchool of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvement in an individuals' cognition is the key to promote garbage classification. This study takes university students as the research subjects, through three educational interventions, including the self-learning, heuristic learning, and interactive learning ways, to seek the most effective intervention based upon event-related potentials (ERPs) that is beneficial to enhance cognition of garbage classification. The results show that the experimental subjects induced P300 and LPP components, representing attentional changes and cognitive conflicts in classification judgments. There are differences in the amplitudes and peak latency of the two components corresponding to different interventions, indicating that the three educational interventions are able to improve the individual's cognition level of garbage classification within a certain period of time. The interactive-learning intervention triggers the largest amplitudes of P300 and LPP, as well as the smallest peak latency, indicating its effect is the best. Such results provide insight into the design for an appropriate strategy in garbage classification education. The study also shows that an EEG signal can be used as the endogenous neural indicator to measure the performance of garbage classification under different educational interventions.

Indexed as

CognitionGarbageAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumanscognitioneducational interventionERPgarbage classificationLPPP300

Identifiers

PMID35886418
PMCPMC9323723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.