Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Reconciling Work and Family Demands and Related Psychosocial Risk and Support Factors among Working Families: A Finnish National Survey Study.

Janina M Björk, Johanna Nordmyr, Anna K Forsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janina M BjörkDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65101 Vaasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-3296
Johanna NordmyrHealth Sciences, Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65101 Vaasa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5296-001X
Anna K ForsmanHealth Sciences, Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65101 Vaasa, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working families commonly struggle with reconciling work and family demands. While the Nordic welfare states have been regarded as forerunners in family-friendly policies, worldwide trends threaten work-family reconciliation also in this context. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations between family interference with work (FIW)/work interference with family (WIF) and selected psychosocial risk and support factors in the work and family settings of Finnish working families. Data from the Finnish Quality of Work Life Survey 2018 collected by Statistics Finland were utilized to conduct binary logistic regression analyses (N = 1431). Risk factors in the work setting emerged as key covariates as all of them showed statistically significant associations with WIF or both WIF and FIW. Another key finding was that occasional conflicts within the family were beneficial in the context of both WIF and FIW. To conclude, both distinct and mutual psychosocial risk and support factors of FIW and WIF were identified, at the same time as two socio-demographic factors as well as one workplace factor were identified as covariates specifically of FIW. This study showed that work-family reconciliation is a considerable challenge among Finnish working families, and especially to women.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalWorkplaceFamilyFemaleFinlandHumansRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesFinlandgender equalitypsychosocial support and risk factorsregression analysissurveys and questionnaireswork–family conflict

Identifiers

PMID35886417
PMCPMC9318108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.