Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886413›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Research Trends in Crop-Livestock Systems: A Bibliometric Review.

Guoting Yang, Jing Li, Zhen Liu, Yitao Zhang, Xiangbo Xu, Hong Zhang, Yan Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoting YangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Jing LiKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Zhen LiuYellow River Delta Modern Agricultural Engineering Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yitao ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Xiangbo XuKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Hong ZhangRural Energy and Environment Agency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China.
Yan XuYellow River Delta Modern Agricultural Engineering Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural straw waste and livestock manure are often misplaced resources. The separation of planting and breeding has induced significant pressure on the environment. Thus, there is a growing need for a system that can integrate crop and livestock farming to improve resource efficiency. To clarify the current state of crop-livestock systems in China and elsewhere, a bibliometric analysis was conducted for a total of 18,628 published English and 3460 published Chinese research articles and dissertations on circular agriculture. The published research papers were taken from the ISI Web of Science and CNKI database to explore research hotpots, research methods, theme trends, and mainstream technical models of crop-livestock systems from 1981 to 2021. Recent progress in crop-livestock systems was analyzed from ecological, economic, social benefits, and stakeholder perspectives. The research results showed that compared with traditional agricultural models, crop-livestock systems had far more ecologic and social benefits, including gaining higher net income and input-output ratio, improving soil quality, and mitigating global warming. The drivers of crop-livestock systems' development were also analyzed from stakeholders' perspectives. The study provides insights into the development of circular agriculture by reducing the pollution risks of agricultural waste and improving both ecological and economic benefits of the system.

Indexed as

AgricultureLivestockAnimalsBibliometricsFarmsManureManureagro-pastoral systemsCiteSpaceecological benefitseconomic benefits

Identifiers

PMID35886413
PMCPMC9318012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.