Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886310›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Comparing the Psychometric Properties among Three Versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale in Individuals with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder.

Chung-Ying Lin, Ching-Shu Tsai, Cian-Ruei Jian, Shu-Ru Chao, Peng-Wei Wang, Huang-Chi Lin, Mei-Feng Huang, Yi-Chun Yeh, Tai-Ling Liu, Cheng-Sheng Chen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experiences relating to intimacy, romance, and sexuality in early psychosis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-4242
Ching-Shu TsaiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7371-1757
Cian-Ruei JianDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Shu-Ru ChaoDepartment of Social Work, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
Peng-Wei WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Huang-Chi LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Mei-Feng HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Yi-Chun YehDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Tai-Ling LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Cheng-Sheng ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Ya-Ping LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Shu-Ying LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Ching-Hua ChenDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Yun-Chi WangDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Yu-Ping ChangSchool of Nursing, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Yu-Min ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Cheng-Fang YenDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1156-4939
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWChang Gung University · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Pingtung University of Science and Technology · TWNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3; UCLA-LSV3) is widely used for assessing loneliness. Nevertheless, the validity of this scale for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder has not been determined. Additionally, studies validating the eight-item and three-item versions of UCLA-LSV3 have not included individuals with severe mental illness; therefore, whether the short versions are comparable to the full 20-item version of UCLA-LSV3 for this population is unclear. The present study examined the unidimensional structure, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of the Chinese versions of UCLA-LSV3 (i.e., 20-item, 8-item, and 3-item versions) to determine which version is most appropriate for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in Taiwan. A total of 300 participants (267 with schizophrenia and 33 with schizoaffective disorder) completed the scales, comprising UCLA-LSV3, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the suicidality module of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiological Version (K-SADS-E), and the family and peer Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) index. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis. The three versions of UCLA-LSV3 were compared with the CES-D, the suicidality module of the K-SADS-E, and the family and peer APGAR index to establish concurrent validity. The results indicated that all three versions of UCLA-LSV3 exhibited acceptable to satisfactory psychometric properties in terms of unidimensional constructs, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability. The full version of UCLA-LSV3 had the best performance, followed by the eight-item version and the three-item version. Moreover, the three versions had relatively strong associations with each other. Therefore, when deliberating which version of UCLA-LSV3 is the best choice for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, healthcare providers and therapists should consider time availability and practicality.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaHumansLonelinessPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesconfirmatory factor analysislonelinesspsychological well-beingpsychometric propertiesschizoaffectiveschizophreniaUCLA Loneliness Scale

Identifiers

PMID35886310
PMCPMC9319140
OpenAlexW4285042659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.