Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886242›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Knowledge, Perceptions, Attitudes and Practices of Midwives Regarding Maternal Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination: A Qualitative Study.

Antonia Arreciado Marañón, María Isabel Fernández-Cano, Laura Montero-Pons, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Azahara Reyes-Lacalle, Rosa María Cabedo-Ferreiro, Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez, Gemma Falguera-Puig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia Arreciado MarañónDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-1430
María Isabel Fernández-CanoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-2345
Laura Montero-PonsAtenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva de Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, 08921 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-906X
Maria Feijoo-CidDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-373X
Azahara Reyes-LacalleResearch Group Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa María Cabedo-FerreiroResearch Group Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5138-3927
Josep Maria Manresa-DomínguezDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma Falguera-PuigResearch Group Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coverage of maternal vaccination against pertussis and, particularly, influenza is lower than expected. The lack of recommendation from healthcare providers conditions non-vaccination in pregnant women. The purpose was to determine the knowledge, perceptions, attitudes and practices of midwives regarding maternal influenza and pertussis vaccination. A qualitative descriptive study based on semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with seventeen midwives was conducted, including purposive sampling and thematic analyses. Midwives had disparate knowledge and perceptions about the severity of influenza and pertussis in pregnant women, and influenza was not considered very serious. The vaccines were generally considered safe. However, because midwives did not have enough information about the safety of the influenza vaccine, there was a tendency not to recommend it. While most midwives had a positive attitude toward vaccination, their advocation for vaccination against influenza was not as clear as it was for pertussis. Not wanting to influence the decision and assuming an informative-facilitating role also led providers to recommend the influenza vaccine less frequently. Midwives are among the main sources of professional advice for pregnant women. Addressing their understanding and professional practices regarding maternal vaccination is key to change the attitude of pregnant women and thus increase vaccine uptake among them, particularly for influenza.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMidwiferyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousWhooping CoughFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPertussis VaccinePregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluenza VaccinesPertussis Vaccineimmunizationinfluenzamidwivespertussispregnancyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35886242
PMCPMC9322479
OpenAlexW4285009831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.