Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35886200›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Felice Curcio, Cesar Iván Avilés González, Maria Zicchi, Gabriele Sole, Gabriele Finco, Oumaima Ez Zinabi, Pedro Melo, Maura Galletta, José R Martinez-Riera

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Felice CurcioFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Sassari (UNISS), Viale San Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-1065
Cesar Iván Avilés GonzálezDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1566-1974
Maria ZicchiFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Sassari (UNISS), Viale San Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Gabriele SoleMater Olbia Hospital, Strada Statale 125 Orientale Sarda, 07026 Olbia, Italy.
Gabriele FincoDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-9865
Oumaima Ez ZinabiMater Olbia Hospital, Strada Statale 125 Orientale Sarda, 07026 Olbia, Italy.
Pedro MeloCentre for Interdisiplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-6384
Maura GallettaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-4248
José R Martinez-RieraDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.
University of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Alicante · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a challenge for education systems around the world. This study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing students, by assessing their emotions, the level of concern in contracting the virus and their perceived stress. We conducted an observational cross-sectional study. A total of 709 nursing students completed an anonymous questionnaire. The levels of anxiety and stress were assessed using the generalized anxiety disorder scale and the COVID-19 student stress questionnaire, respectively. In total, 56.8% of the sample often or always found it difficult to attend distance-learning activities. The main difficulty referred to was connection problems (75.7%). The mean generalized anxiety disorder score was 9.46 (SD = 5.4) and appeared almost homogeneous among students across the three years of study; most of the students showed mild (35%) to moderate (27%) levels of anxiety; 19% had severe anxiety. The overall COVID-19 stressor mean scores were 11.40 (SD = 6.50); the majority of the students (47.1%) showed scores indicative of moderate stress, 25% showed low stress levels, and 28% showed high-stress levels. Improvements and investments are needed to ensure high-quality distance learning, adequate connectivity, technical support for students, as well as strategies to promote mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, Psychologicalanxietycoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19nursing educationnursing studentsonline educationpandemic lockdownpsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID35886200
PMCPMC9319151
OpenAlexW4284900149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.