Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885828›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

I Think I Should Get Vaccinated, I Feel I Should Not. Individual Differences in Information Processing and Vaccination Behavior (COVID-19).

Cristina Maroiu, Andrei Rusu, Zselyke Pap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina MaroiuDepartment of Psychology, West University of Timisoara, 4 Vasile Pârvan Blvd., 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Andrei RusuDepartment of Psychology, West University of Timisoara, 4 Vasile Pârvan Blvd., 300223 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0036-4149
Zselyke PapDepartment of Psychology, West University of Timisoara, 4 Vasile Pârvan Blvd., 300223 Timisoara, Romania.

Funding

Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS - UEFISCDI PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-1144Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS - UEFISCDI PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-1964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community responded promptly by developing effective vaccines. Still, even though effective vaccines against COVID-19 became available, many people did not seem to be in a rush to become immunized. Community protection can be enhanced if more people decide to vaccinate, and thus it is necessary to identify relevant factors involved in vaccination behavior to find better ways of encouraging it. Vaccination behavior is the result of a decision process that might vary according to individual differences in information processing. We investigated the role of cognitive reflection ability and thinking styles in predicting self-reported vaccination behavior against COVID-19. A sample of 274 Romanian participants was surveyed for the present study, out of which 217 (

Indexed as

cognitive reflection abilityCOVID-19 vaccinationexperientialityindividual differencesinformation processingrationalitythinking style

Identifiers

PMID35885828
PMCPMC9316054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.