Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885749›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.

Jessica L Martin, Dimitrios Saredakis, Amanda D Hutchinson, Gregory B Crawford, Tobias Loetscher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07447310 (The Use Of 360-Degree VR Video For The Psychological Health Of Medical Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07447310 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Use Of 360-Degree VR Video For The Psychological Health Of Medical Students: Comparison Of Effectiveness Between Local And Overseas Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreRan2024 to 2025Enrolled82ConditionsHealthy Adult, Volunteer, Psychological Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Associated With Academic PressureArmsLocal Environment 360-degree VR Video, Overseas Environment 360-Degree VR Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica L MartinUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Dimitrios SaredakisUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Amanda D HutchinsonUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Gregory B CrawfordNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide 5092, Australia.
Tobias LoetscherUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) using head-mounted displays (HMDs) has demonstrated to be an effective tool for treating various somatic and psychological symptoms. Technological advances and increased affordability of VR technology provide an interesting option for delivering psychological interventions to patients in palliative care. The primary aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the available research on the use of VR for enhancing psychological and somatic outcomes for palliative care patients. Secondary aims included assessing general satisfaction and overall usability.

methodA pre-registered systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using OVID Emcare, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed Care Search: Palliative Care Knowledge Network. Peer-reviewed experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, case, and feasibility studies consisting of single or multiple VR sessions using HMDs that reported psychological and/or somatic outcomes were included.

resultsEight studies published between 2019 and 2021 were included, representing 138 patients. While the reported quantitative psychological and somatic outcomes were ambiguous, the qualitative outcomes were largely positive. Participants were generally satisfied with VR, and most studies reported the VR interventions as usable, feasible, and acceptable.

conclusionsVR shows promise in palliative care and generally addresses a range of symptoms with few adverse effects. Future research should consist of adequately powered RCTs evaluating dosage and focusing on providing meaningful activities to enhance outcomes further.

Indexed as

head-mounted displayhospicepalliative carevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35885749
PMCPMC9319274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.