Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885736›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

IMU-Based Monitoring for Assistive Diagnosis and Management of IoHT: A Review.

Fan Bo, Mustafa Yerebakan, Yanning Dai, Weibing Wang, Jia Li, Boyi Hu, Shuo Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fan BoSmart Sensing Research and Development Center, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9788-2772
Mustafa YerebakanDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Yanning DaiSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Weibing WangSmart Sensing Research and Development Center, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Jia LiSmart Sensing Research and Development Center, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Boyi HuDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Shuo GaoSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNBeihang University · CNUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences) Leading Science and Technology (category A) Project XDA22020100CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences) STS (Science and Technology Service Network Initiative) Project 2019T3015National Key Research and Development Plan Foundation 2018YFB2002700National Natural Science Foundation of China 61803017National Natural Science Foundation of China 61827802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, traditional disease diagnoses carried out in medical institutions can now be performed remotely at home or even ambient environments, yielding the concept of the Internet of Health Things (IoHT). Among the diverse IoHT applications, inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based systems play a significant role in the detection of diseases in many fields, such as neurological, musculoskeletal, and mental. However, traditional numerical interpretation methods have proven to be challenging to provide satisfying detection accuracies owing to the low quality of raw data, especially under strong electromagnetic interference (EMI). To address this issue, in recent years, machine learning (ML)-based techniques have been proposed to smartly map IMU-captured data on disease detection and progress. After a decade of development, the combination of IMUs and ML algorithms for assistive disease diagnosis has become a hot topic, with an increasing number of studies reported yearly. A systematic search was conducted in four databases covering the aforementioned topic for articles published in the past six years. Eighty-one articles were included and discussed concerning two aspects: different ML techniques and application scenarios. This review yielded the conclusion that, with the help of ML technology, IMUs can serve as a crucial element in disease diagnosis, severity assessment, characteristic estimation, and monitoring during the rehabilitation process. Furthermore, it summarizes the state-of-the-art, analyzes challenges, and provides foreseeable future trends for developing IMU-ML systems for IoHT.

Indexed as

disease diagnosisIMUInternet of Health Things (IoHT)machine learningmotion monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35885736
PMCPMC9318359
OpenAlexW4283709029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.