Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885647›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Revolution of Lateral Flow Assay in the Field of AMR Detection.

Hervé Boutal, Christian Moguet, Lilas Pommiès, Stéphanie Simon, Thierry Naas, Hervé Volland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of the NG-TESTJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The intricacies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  10. CTX-M-ProducingInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Multidrug ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Microbiology: where do we stand?Frontiers in antibiotics · 2024
    Review
  19. HypervirulentPathogens & immunity · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hervé BoutalDépartement Médicaments et Technologies Pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Christian MoguetDépartement Médicaments et Technologies Pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6497-4889
Lilas PommièsDépartement Médicaments et Technologies Pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Stéphanie SimonDépartement Médicaments et Technologies Pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-8255
Thierry NaasBacteriology-Hygiene Unit, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-9572
Hervé VollandDépartement Médicaments et Technologies Pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7165-3218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global spread of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria represents a considerable public health concern, yet their detection and identification of their resistance mechanisms remain challenging. Optimal diagnostic tests should provide rapid results at low cost to enable implementation in any microbiology laboratory. Lateral flow assays (LFA) meet these requirements and have become essential tools to combat AMR. This review presents the versatility of LFA developed for the AMR detection field, with particular attention to those directly triggering β-lactamases, their performances, and specific limitations. It considers how LFA can be modified by detecting not only the enzyme, but also its β-lactamase activity for a broader clinical sensitivity. Moreover, although LFA allow a short time-to-result, they are generally only implemented after fastidious and time-consuming techniques. We present a sample processing device that shortens and simplifies the handling of clinical samples before the use of LFA. Finally, the capacity of LFA to detect amplified genetic determinants of AMR by isothermal PCR will be discussed. LFA are inexpensive, rapid, and efficient tools that are easy to implement in the routine workflow of laboratories as new first-line tests against AMR with bacterial colonies, and in the near future directly with biological media.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancecarbapenemasesdetectionESBLslateral flow immunoassay

Identifiers

PMID35885647
PMCPMC9317642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.