ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
New Sagittal and Vertical Cephalometric Analysis Methods: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of rapid maxillary expansion and functional orthodontic treatment in children with sleep disordered breathing: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Capabilities of Cephalometric Methods to Study X-rays in Three-Dimensional Space (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Pooled it
- CBCT Evaluation of the Mandibular Foramen According to Age, Sex, and Sagittal Skeletal Class in Growing Individuals.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Vertical and Sagittal Cephalometric Parameters in Differentiating Skeletal Malocclusion in Saudi Adults: A Cephalometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Descriptive Case Series on the Use of AMCOPBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the association between skeletal malocclusions and dental maturity in German children and adolescents : A retrospective cross-sectional study.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
- Radiographic evaluation of increased overjet in skeletal Class II and other malocclusion classifications.Journal of orthodontic science · 2026Article
- Does the chin projection and sella point position affect the W angle reliability?European oral research · 2026Article
- Optimizing Maxillomandibular Position in Orthognathic Surgery: Introducing the T Concept in Treatment Planning.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025Review
- Comparison of the reliability of ANB Sar and W measurements used in cephalometric diagnostics for the assessment of sagittal discrepancy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Use of X means and C4.5 algorithms on lateral cephalometric measurements to identify craniofacial patterns.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Selected Indicators Used in Cephalometric Analysis and Their Predictive Value in Defining Sagittal Discrepancy Malocclusions: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Repeatability and Reproducibility Levels of ANB, Tau and Yen Angle Measurements Used in Cephalometric Diagnostics in the Assessment of Sagittal Discrepancy: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sagittal Skeletal Relationship and Craniocervical Posture in Peruvian Children.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Predictable Full Digital Workflow Using Stackable Surgical Templates for Complete Dental Arch Rehabilitation with Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations-Case Series and Proof of Concept.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Digital versus Manual Tracing in Cephalometric Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- A New Approach for the Assessment of True Maxillomandibular Sagittal Relationship: A Zeta Angle.Cureus · 2024Article
- Bone Remodeling of Maxilla after Retraction of Incisors during Orthodontic Treatment with Extraction of Premolars Based on CBCT Study: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Lower Incisor-Pg: A New Cephalometric Parameter to Evaluate the Anterior Limit of Dentition.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Comparison of Diagnostic Validity of Cephalometric Analyses of the ANB Angle and Tau Angle for Assessment of the Sagittal Relationship of Jaw and Mandible.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cephalometric analysis is an essential tool used in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The main objectives of correct cephalometric analysis include resolving anteroposterior and vertical maxillary and mandibular base discrepancies. For a diagnostic tool to be of value, it should be precise, reliable and reproducible. Unfortunately, according to some studies, the accuracy of input and, therefore, the diagnostic reliability of some of the points and measurements may not be satisfactory. To this end, new cephalometric measurements are being developed with increased precision. In order to properly and definitively determine the usefulness of a given measurement in cephalometric diagnosis, it is necessary to carry out a critical evaluation of available studies. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available scientific literature describing new landmarks and reference linear and angular measurements of 2D cephalometric analyses assessing the sagittal and vertical discrepancy in the position of jaw bases since the last systematic review in 2013. The secondary aim was to assess the accuracy and reliability of new anthropometric landmarks and reference planes in relation to those used previously, and their instability in relation to growth and orthodontic tooth movements. To carry out the intended plan, electronic databases such as PubMed, Scholar Google, Web of Science and Pro Quest were searched using specific keywords. Initially, a total of 1451 articles were retrieved. Then, duplicate articles in all databases were excluded from the resulting publications. The results showed that despite such a high number of articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, only 12 studies on new cephalometric analyses in the sagittal plane and 4 studies on new cephalometric analyses in the horizontal plane met the criteria and, as a result, were included in the review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.