Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885622›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Adrenal Venous Sampling Could Be Omitted before Surgery in Patients with Conn's Adenoma Confirmed by Computed Tomography and Higher Normal Aldosterone Concentration after Saline Infusion Test.

Robert Holaj, Petr Waldauf, Dan Wichterle, Jan Kvasnička, Tomáš Zelinka, Ondřej Petrák, Zuzana Krátká, Lubomíra Forejtová, Jan Kaván, Jiří Widimský

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert HolajCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-9706
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Šrobárova 1150/50, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Dan WichterleDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KvasničkaCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš ZelinkaCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3395-8373
Ondřej PetrákCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-3562
Zuzana KrátkáCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-2926
Lubomíra ForejtováDepartment of Radiology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KavánDepartment of Radiology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří WidimskýCentre for Hypertension, 3rd Department of Medicine, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 504/1, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic Progres Q35Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic DRO (General University Hospital in Prague - VFN, 00064165)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdrenal venous sampling (AVS) performed to distinguish unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) is invasive and poorly standardized. This study aimed to identify non-invasive characteristics that can select the patients with unilateral PA who could bypass AVS before surgery.

methodsA single-center study collected a total of 450 patients with PA. Development and validation cohorts included 242 and 208 patients. The AVS was successful in 150 and 138 patients from the cohorts, and the unilateral PA was found in 96 and 94 patients, respectively. Clinical factors independently associated with lateralized AVS in multivariable logistic regression were used to construct a unilateral PA prediction score (SCORE).

resultsThe proposed SCORE was calculated as a sum of the prevalence of adrenal nodule on computed tomography (2 points) and plasma/serum aldosterone concentration ≥ 165 ng/L after the saline infusion test (SIT) (1 point). Importantly, the SCORE = 3 points identified 48% of unilateral PA patients with a specificity of 100% in the development cohort. The zero rate of false-positive classifications was preserved with the same cut-off value in the validation cohort.

conclusionsAVS could be omitted before surgery in patients with typical Conn´s adenoma provided the aldosterone concentration ≥ 165 ng/L after the SIT.

Indexed as

adrenal venous samplingaldosterone-producing adenomaidiopathic aldosteronismprediction scoreprimary aldosteronismsaline infusion test

Identifiers

PMID35885622
PMCPMC9315939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.