Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885569›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT or PET/MRI Using PSMA-Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals in High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis.

Barbara Muoio, Domenico Albano, Francesco Dondi, Francesco Bertagna, Valentina Garibotto, Jolanta Kunikowska, Arnoldo Piccardo, Salvatore Annunziata, Vittoria Espeli, Denis Migliorini and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic Accuracy of PET withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Barbara MuoioOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Domenico AlbanoDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-6494
Francesco DondiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4839-9033
Francesco BertagnaDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Valentina GaribottoDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals and Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-698X
Jolanta KunikowskaNuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-6720
Arnoldo PiccardoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero "Ospedali Galliera", 16128 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6779-1471
Salvatore AnnunziataUnit of Nuclear Medicine, TracerGLab, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Vittoria EspeliOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Denis MiglioriniDepartment of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Giorgio TregliaImaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6501 Bellinzona, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9808-780X
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHUniversity of Brescia · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITMedical University of Warsaw · PLUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies proposed the use of positron emission tomography (PET) with Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in brain tumors. Our aim is to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these methods in high-grade gliomas (HGG) with a bivariate meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive literature search of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT or PET/MRI with PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in HGG was performed. Original articles evaluating these imaging methods both in the differential diagnosis between HGG and low-grade gliomas (LGG) and in the assessment of suspicious HGG recurrence were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was also assessed using the I

resultsThe meta-analysis of six selected studies (157 patients) provided the following results about PET/CT or PET/MRI with PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in the diagnosis of HGG: sensitivity 98.2% (95% CI: 75.3-99.9%), specificity 91.2% (95% CI: 68.4-98.1%), LR+ 4.5 (95% CI: 2.2-9.3), LR- 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.15), and DOR 70.1 (95% CI: 19.6-250.9). No significant statistical heterogeneity among the included studies was found (I

conclusionsthe quantitative data provided demonstrate the high diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT or PET/MRI with PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals for HGG detection. However, more studies are needed to confirm the promising role of PSMA-targeted PET in this clinical setting.

Indexed as

brain tumorsglioblastomagliomameta-analysisneuro-oncologynuclear medicinePETpositron emission tomographyPSMA

Identifiers

PMID35885569
PMCPMC9323081
OpenAlexW4285013882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.