ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Diffuse GFAP Immunopositivity in the Oligodendrocyte-like Component of Pilocytic Astrocytoma Distinguishes It from Mimickers.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling morphology, methylation profiling, and diagnostic challenges in BRAF-Mutant pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2024Article
- Suprasellar pilocytic astrocytoma with leptomeningeal dissemination.SA journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilocytic astrocytoma with a predominant oligodendrocyte-like component can be difficult to distinguish from oligodendroglioma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNTs), central neurocytoma, and ependymoma (clear cell phenotype). The utility of GFAP immunostaining in this context is not well discussed. All cases with a diagnosis of pilocytic astrocytoma were retrieved from the pathological archives along with the following information: age, sex, and pathological description. The GFAP immunostaining was scored as score 1 (<25%), score 2 (25−50%), score 3 (50−75%), and score 4 (>75%). The comparison group included oligodendrogliomas, DNTs, ependymomas, and central neurocytomas. All 26 cases (16 males and 10 females) of pilocytic astrocytoma showed strong and diffuse (score 4) GFAP immunostaining in the neoplastic cells of both the solid fibrillary and oligodendrocyte-like components. The staining pattern in the neoplastic round cells in the oligodendrocyte-like areas was perinuclear cytoplasmic with no processes. In the comparison group, GFAP immunostaining was mostly restricted to the reactive astrocytes in the background. Focal areas of the neoplastic cells showed scores of 1−3 in the neoplastic cells, but the staining pattern was different from those in pilocytic astrocytoma. In the setting of tumors with predominant oligodendrocyte-like areas, the GFAP immunostaining score and pattern help distinguish pilocytic astrocytoma from its mimickers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.