Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885480›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Spontaneous Uterine Rupture and Adenomyosis, a Rare but Possible Correlation: Case Report and Literature Review.

Antonella Vimercati, Miriam Dellino, Cosimina Suma, Gianluca Raffaello Damiani, Antonio Malvasi, Gerardo Cazzato, Eliano Cascardi, Leonardo Resta, Ettore Cicinelli

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonella VimercatiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-1619
Miriam DellinoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-4648
Cosimina SumaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Valle d'Itria" Hospital, 74015 Martina Franca, Italy.
Gianluca Raffaello DamianiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-8068
Antonio MalvasiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.
Gerardo CazzatoDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-4316
Eliano CascardiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-4285
Leonardo RestaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-4776
Ettore CicinelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Policlinic of Bari, University of Bari, Piazza Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a serious obstetric complication with a high incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality. (2) Methods: The present case is a rare event of a uterine rupture occurring in an unscarred uterus in a nonlaboring primigravida woman in the second trimester. The only risk factor in this case was adenomyosis found in the preconceptional phase. (3) Results: The diagnosis of adenomyosis can often be difficult, so patients should be evaluated by a specialized gynecologist. After careful amnestic collection, a gynecological examination and II level ultrasound should be performed in accordance with the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment classification. (4) Conclusions: This evaluation allows us to identify classes of patients at high risk of uterine rupture who, therefore, must be properly informed of the risks both during preconceptional counseling and during pregnancy.

Indexed as

morphological uterus sonographic assessment classificationspontaneous uterine rupture and adenomyosis

Identifiers

PMID35885480
PMCPMC9317678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.