ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
BI-RADS-Based Classification of Mammographic Soft Tissue Opacities Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different BI-RADS breast cancer diagnosis using MobileNetV1 and vision transformer based on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinically Aware Learning: Ordinal Loss Improves Medical Image Classifiers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- BCECNN: an explainable deep ensemble architecture for accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Mam-Incept-Net: a novel inception model for precise interpretation of mammography images.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- CNN-Based Cross-Modality Fusion for Enhanced Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammography and Ultrasound.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification in Ultrasound and Mammography Images via Fusion of Deep Learning and Handcraft Features.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Novel Method to Model Image Creation Based on Mammographic Sensors Performance Parameters: A Theoretical Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of a machine learning algorithm to classify breast cancer solely by the presence of soft tissue opacities in mammograms, independent of other morphological features, using a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN). Soft tissue opacities were classified based on their radiological appearance using the ACR BI-RADS atlas. We included 1744 mammograms from 438 patients to create 7242 icons by manual labeling. The icons were sorted into three categories: "no opacities" (BI-RADS 1), "probably benign opacities" (BI-RADS 2/3) and "suspicious opacities" (BI-RADS 4/5). A dCNN was trained (70% of data), validated (20%) and finally tested (10%). A sliding window approach was applied to create colored probability maps for visual impression. Diagnostic performance of the dCNN was compared to human readout by experienced radiologists on a "real-world" dataset. The accuracies of the models on the test dataset ranged between 73.8% and 89.8%. Compared to human readout, our dCNN achieved a higher specificity (100%, 95% CI: 85.4-100%; reader 1: 86.2%, 95% CI: 67.4-95.5%; reader 2: 79.3%, 95% CI: 59.7-91.3%), and the sensitivity (84.0%, 95% CI: 63.9-95.5%) was lower than that of human readers (reader 1:88.0%, 95% CI: 67.4-95.4%; reader 2:88.0%, 95% CI: 67.7-96.8%). In conclusion, a dCNN can be used for the automatic detection as well as the standardized and observer-independent classification of soft tissue opacities in mammograms independent of the presence of microcalcifications. Human decision making in accordance with the BI-RADS classification can be mimicked by artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.