Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885470›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

BI-RADS-Based Classification of Mammographic Soft Tissue Opacities Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Albin Sabani, Anna Landsmann, Patryk Hejduk, Cynthia Schmidt, Magda Marcon, Karol Borkowski, Cristina Rossi, Alexander Ciritsis, Andreas Boss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albin SabaniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna LandsmannInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-5797
Patryk HejdukInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Cynthia SchmidtInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Magda MarconInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Karol BorkowskiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Cristina RossiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander CiritsisInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas BossInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 183568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of a machine learning algorithm to classify breast cancer solely by the presence of soft tissue opacities in mammograms, independent of other morphological features, using a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN). Soft tissue opacities were classified based on their radiological appearance using the ACR BI-RADS atlas. We included 1744 mammograms from 438 patients to create 7242 icons by manual labeling. The icons were sorted into three categories: "no opacities" (BI-RADS 1), "probably benign opacities" (BI-RADS 2/3) and "suspicious opacities" (BI-RADS 4/5). A dCNN was trained (70% of data), validated (20%) and finally tested (10%). A sliding window approach was applied to create colored probability maps for visual impression. Diagnostic performance of the dCNN was compared to human readout by experienced radiologists on a "real-world" dataset. The accuracies of the models on the test dataset ranged between 73.8% and 89.8%. Compared to human readout, our dCNN achieved a higher specificity (100%, 95% CI: 85.4-100%; reader 1: 86.2%, 95% CI: 67.4-95.5%; reader 2: 79.3%, 95% CI: 59.7-91.3%), and the sensitivity (84.0%, 95% CI: 63.9-95.5%) was lower than that of human readers (reader 1:88.0%, 95% CI: 67.4-95.4%; reader 2:88.0%, 95% CI: 67.7-96.8%). In conclusion, a dCNN can be used for the automatic detection as well as the standardized and observer-independent classification of soft tissue opacities in mammograms independent of the presence of microcalcifications. Human decision making in accordance with the BI-RADS classification can be mimicked by artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast neoplasmscomputermachine learningmammographyneural networks

Identifiers

PMID35885470
PMCPMC9318280
OpenAlexW4283639690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.