Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885462›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Detection of Dysplasia: Data Mining from Our Hematology Analyzers.

Jaja Zhu, Sylvain Clauser, Nicolas Freynet, Valérie Bardet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaja ZhuService d'Hématologie-Immunologie-Transfusion, CHU Ambroise Paré, APHP.Paris Saclay, Université Versailles Saint Quentin-Université Paris Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2846-6681
Sylvain ClauserService d'Hématologie-Immunologie-Transfusion, CHU Ambroise Paré, APHP.Paris Saclay, Université Versailles Saint Quentin-Université Paris Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Nicolas FreynetDépartement d'Hématologie et Immunologie Biologiques, GHU Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France.
Valérie BardetService d'Hématologie-Immunologie-Transfusion, CHU Ambroise Paré, APHP.Paris Saclay, Université Versailles Saint Quentin-Université Paris Saclay, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-3357
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are clonal hematopoietic diseases of the elderly, characterized by chronic cytopenia, ineffective and dysplastic hematopoiesis, recurrent genetic abnormalities and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Diagnosis on a complete blood count (CBC) can be challenging due to numerous other non-neoplastic causes of cytopenias. New generations of hematology analyzers provide cell population data (CPD) that can be exploited to reliably detect MDSs from a routine CBC. In this review, we first describe the different technologies used to obtain CPD. We then give an overview of the currently available data regarding the performance of CPD for each lineage in the diagnostic workup of MDSs. Adequate exploitation of CPD can yield very strong diagnostic performances allowing for faster diagnosis and reduction of time-consuming slide reviews in the hematology laboratory.

Indexed as

cell population datacomplete blood counthematology analyzerleukocyte differentialmyelodysplastic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35885462
PMCPMC9315627
OpenAlexW4283512771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.