ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Pulmonary Lesion Classification Framework Using the Weighted Ensemble Classification with Random Forest and CNN Models for EBUS Images.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and digital health in bronchoscopy: advances in diagnostic accuracy, real-time navigation and procedural skills training.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Endobronchial Ultrasound for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Scoping Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Using Endobronchial Ultrasonography Image Based on Multi-Scale Image and Multi-Feature Fusion Framework.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is a deadly disease with a high mortality rate. Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) is one of the methods for detecting pulmonary lesions. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary lesions from images can help radiologists to classify lesions; however, most of the existing methods need a large volume of data to give good results. Thus, this paper proposes a novel pulmonary lesion classification framework for EBUS images that works well with small datasets. The proposed framework integrates the statistical results from three classification models using the weighted ensemble classification. The three classification models include the radiomics feature and patient data-based model, the single-image-based model, and the multi-patch-based model. The radiomics features are combined with the patient data to be used as input data for the random forest, whereas the EBUS images are used as input data to the other two CNN models. The performance of the proposed framework was evaluated on a set of 200 EBUS images consisting of 124 malignant lesions and 76 benign lesions. The experimental results show that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve are 95.00%, 100%, 86.67%, 92.59%, 100%, and 93.33%, respectively. This framework can significantly improve the pulmonary lesion classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.