Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885453›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Matrix Effect in the RT-PCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva without RNA Extraction.

Orlando Morais, Manuel Rui Alves, Carla Ramos, Fernando Ferreira, Paulo Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Rapid and Modular Nanobody Assay for Plug-and-Play Antigen Detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative evaluation of assay performance for SARS-CoV-2 detection in animal oral samples, lung homogenates, and phosphate-buffered saline using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orlando MoraisEscola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9484-3233
Manuel Rui AlvesEscola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Carla RamosEscola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-304X
Fernando FerreiraACES Cávado III Barcelos/Esposende, Rua Dr. Abel Varzim, 4750-253 Barcelos, Portugal.
Paulo FernandesEscola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3148-4445

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Project 72545, 02/SAICT/2020, FEDER, Portugal2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/05937/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/05937/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work focuses on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, contributing to understanding the inhibition effect of the matrix and its influence on the results. Detection of viral genes ORF1ab, N, and E was performed by RT-PCR using saliva directly in the reaction without RNA extraction. Different amounts of saliva were spiked with increasing amounts of viral RNA from COVID-19 patients and subjected to RT-PCR detection. In parallel, 64 saliva samples from confirmed COVID-19 patients were used in two different amounts directly in the RT-PCR reaction and their results compared. The presence of saliva in the RT-PCR always causes a positive shift of the Ct values, but a very high between-person variability of its magnitude was obtained, with increases ranging from 0.93 to 11.36. Viral targets are also affected differently depending on the initial number of viral particles. Due to inhibitors present in saliva, the duplication of sample volume causes only 48 to 61% of the expected Ct value decrease depending on the viral target gene. The use of saliva has advantages, but also limitations, due to potential inhibitors present in the matrix. However, the choice of the target and the right amount of sample may significantly influence the results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ct valuesdetectioninhibitionRT-PCRsalivaSARS-CoV-2sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID35885453
PMCPMC9318260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.