Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885409›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Specific Microbial Communities Are Selected in Minimally-Processed Fruit and Vegetables according to the Type of Product.

Giuseppina Sequino, Vincenzo Valentino, Elena Torrieri, Francesca De Filippis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppina SequinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Vincenzo ValentinoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6055-4721
Elena TorrieriDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7461-4705
Francesca De FilippisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3474-2884

Funding

European Union's H2020 Research and Innovation Program 817936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruits and vegetables (F&V) products are recommended for the daily diet due to their low caloric content, high amount of vitamins, minerals and fiber. Furthermore, these foods are a source of various phytochemical compounds, such as polyphenols, flavonoids and sterols, exerting antioxidant activity. Despite the benefits derived from eating raw F&V, the quality and safety of these products may represent a source of concern, since they can be quickly spoiled and have a very short shelf-life. Moreover, they may be a vehicle of pathogenic microorganisms. This study aims to evaluate the bacterial and fungal populations in F&V products (i.e., iceberg lettuces, arugula, spinaches, fennels, tomatoes and pears) by using culture-dependent microbiological analysis and high-throughput sequencing (HTS), in order to decipher the microbial populations that characterize minimally-processed F&V. Our results show that F&V harbor diverse and product-specific bacterial and fungal communities, with vegetables leaf morphology and type of edible fraction of fruits exerting the highest influence. In addition, we observed that several alterative (e.g.,

Indexed as

fresh-cutfruit microbiotaminimally-processed vegetablesvegetable microbiotavegetable spoilage

Identifiers

PMID35885409
PMCPMC9315490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.