Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885352›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Shopping in Reality or Virtuality? A Validation Study of Consumers' Price Memory in a Virtual vs. Physical Supermarket.

Lina Fogt Jacobsen, Nora Mossing Krogsgaard-Jensen, Anne O Peschel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lina Fogt JacobsenMAPP Centre, Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-929X
Nora Mossing Krogsgaard-JensenMAPP Centre, Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne O PeschelMAPP Centre, Department of Management, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-5974

Funding

Commercial and Retail Management Initiative, Aarhus University, Denmark NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study validates a VR supermarket as a research tool by studying the influence of the food shopping setting on consumers' price memory-an important antecedent for price comparisons in the purchase situation. In a quasi-experiment, two groups of consumers were given a shopping task in either a physical supermarket or a virtual reality supermarket setting. Upon task completion, participants' explicit and implicit price memory was measured across three food product categories (pizza sauce, pasta, and dark chocolate). Results revealed no significant difference between the two settings, supporting the comparability between the VR shopping experience and the experience in the physical supermarket. The VR supermarket can therefore be a valid tool for studying consumer food choice behaviour in a shopping context. Further results show that explicit price memory is weaker compared to implicit price memory, that even prices are remembered better than odd prices, and that price memory follows the expected pattern in a VR supermarket as well. Finally, exploratory findings indicate that the feeling of physical presence and self-presence is relatively high for this particular VR supermarket, whereas social presence is weaker.

Indexed as

behavioural pricingfood choicevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35885352
PMCPMC9316986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.