Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885040›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Modulation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Keeping Lymphocytes Out of the Intestine.

Arianna Dal Buono, Roberto Gabbiadini, Ludovico Alfarone, Virginia Solitano, Alessandro Repici, Stefania Vetrano, Antonino Spinelli, Alessandro Armuzzi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Treatment Strategies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transmembrane protein CD69 acts as an S1PR1 agonist.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arianna Dal BuonoIBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-4355
Roberto GabbiadiniIBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ludovico AlfaroneIBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9702-4508
Virginia SolitanoIBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-6778
Alessandro RepiciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Stefania VetranoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Antonino SpinelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1493-1768
Alessandro ArmuzziIBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic and disabling conditions that, uncontrolled, lead to irreversible bowel damage and associated comorbidities. Despite the new era of biological therapies, IBDs remain not curative. The treatment purpose is to induce endoscopic remission, reduce the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life. Optimal and early treatment could enable the prevention of their complications. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the capacity of overcoming the limitations of biologic agents (i.e., parenteral administration, rapidity of action and primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Of special interest are results from the use of oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (ozanimod, etrasimod, fingolimod and laquinimod), based on S1P activities to target lymphocyte recirculation in the mucosa, acting as immunosuppressive agents. Most S1P modulators are reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of both UC and CD. High and satisfactory rates of clinical remission as well as endoscopic improvement and remission can be achieved with these molecules. Safety alarms remain rather low, although the S1P binding to two of its G protein-coupled receptors, 2 and 3 (S1PR2 and S1PR3), may be associated with cardiovascular risks. Cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define their place in therapy. This review summarizes these emerging data published by PubMed and EMBASE databases and from ongoing clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of selectivity of S1P modulators in the treatment of IBD.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseaseoral therapysmall moleculessphingosine 1-phosphateulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35885040
PMCPMC9313037
OpenAlexW4285793933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.