Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35885004›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Dissecting the

Warren B Nothnick, Amanda Graham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Warren B NothnickDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Amanda GrahamDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of miR-451 in Endometriosis Pathophysiology and TreatmentR01HD069043 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NOTHNICK, WARREN B · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069043NIH HHS HD069043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is an enigmatic disease characterized by pain and infertility in which endometrial tissue grows in ectopic locations, predominantly the pelvic cavity. The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis is complex and postulated to involve alterations in inflammatory, cell proliferation and post-transcriptional regulatory pathways among others. Our understanding on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis is further complicated by the fact that endometriosis can only be diagnosed by laparoscopy only after the disease has manifested. This makes it difficult to understand the true pathogenesis as a cause-and-effect relationship is difficult to ascertain. To aid in our understanding on endometriosis pathogenesis and pathophysiology, numerous rodent models have been developed. In this case, we discuss further assessment of a

Indexed as

CD74endometriosisexperimental modelMIFmiR-451a

Identifiers

PMID35885004
PMCPMC9313350
OpenAlexW4285594824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.