Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884865›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

3D Printed Hydrogels for Ocular Wound Healing.

Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim, Mohammadmahdi Mobaraki, Madjid Soltani, Mohammad Kiani Shahvandi, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, Elham Afzali, Kaamran Raahemifar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. 3D Printing-Based Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamadreza AghamirsalimTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-1178
Mohammadmahdi MobarakiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 15875-4413, Iran.
Madjid SoltaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-6274
Mohammad Kiani ShahvandiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran.
Mahmoud JabbarvandTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran 14176-14411, Iran.
Elham AfzaliPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman 76169-13555, Iran.
Kaamran RaahemifarData Science and Artificial Intelligence Program, College of Information Sciences and Technology (IST), Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-7897
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRAmirkabir University of Technology · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRK.N.Toosi University of Technology · IRPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal disease is one of the most significant causes of blindness around the world. Presently, corneal transplantation is the only way to treat cornea blindness. It should be noted that the amount of cornea that people donate is so much less than that required (1:70). Therefore, scientists have tried to resolve this problem with tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Fabricating cornea with traditional methods is difficult due to their unique properties, such as transparency and geometry. Bioprinting is a technology based on additive manufacturing that can use different biomaterials as bioink for tissue engineering, and the emergence of 3D bioprinting presents a clear possibility to overcome this problem. This new technology requires special materials for printing scaffolds with acceptable biocompatibility. Hydrogels have received significant attention in the past 50 years, and they have been distinguished from other materials because of their unique and outstanding properties. Therefore, hydrogels could be a good bioink for the bioprinting of different scaffolds for corneal tissue engineering. In this review, we discuss the use of different types of hydrogel for bioink for corneal tissue engineering and various methods that have been used for bioprinting. Furthermore, the properties of hydrogels and different types of hydrogels are described.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkocular wound healingscaffold-based hydrogels

Identifiers

PMID35884865
PMCPMC9313212
OpenAlexW4283765107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.