ReviewBiomedicines2022
The Current Status of Molecular Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abbreviated non-contrast magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease: a reliability study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Investigating Handgrip Strength as a Practical Biomarker for Therapeutic Endpoints and Nutritional Status in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of fecal eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and lipocalin-2 in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Current approaches to disease severity and therapy effectiveness assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Impact of Fermented Dairy on Gastrointestinal Health and Associated Biomarkers.Nutrition reviews · 2026Review
- Advancing IBD Management: A Literature Review on the Role of Non-Invasive Blood-Based Biomarkers in Predicting and Assessing Pharmacodynamic Response to Treatment.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Oral Colon-Targeted Lipid Nanoparticles Enhance Upadacitinib Delivery and Efficacy in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and immunomodulatory effect of erythropoietin in postoperative ileus.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Fecal intestinal inflammatory biomarkers in piglets: analytical validation, homogeneity and stability studies.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- DEFB4A/hBD2, a non-invasive serum biomarker for detection of ulcerative colitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in biosensors for diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease: A review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Serum C-Reactive Protein as a Potential Indicator for Screening Fecal Calprotectin in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.International journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Is Eosinophilic Colitis a Forerunner of Inflammatory Bowel Disease?Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Gut Feeling: Biomarkers and Biosensors' Potential in Revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Diagnosis and Prognosis-A Comprehensive Review.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Serum proteins and faecal microbiota as potential biomarkers in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome patients.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Identification and Validation of Biomarkers to Predict Early Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Its Progression to Colorectal Cancer.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Galectin-3-Insights from Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Integrating Proteomics into Personalized Medicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Reality or Challenge?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Value of Inflammatory Markers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical and Endoscopic Correlations.Cureus · 2025Article
- Fecal Arachidonic Acid: A Potential Biomarker for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Severity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-a chronic inflammation that affects the gastrointestinal tract of patients-are challenging, as most clinical symptoms are not specific to IBD, and are often seen in other inflammatory diseases, such as intestinal infections, drug-induced colitis, and monogenic diseases. To date, there is no gold-standard test for monitoring IBD. Endoscopy and imaging are essential diagnostic tools that provide information about the disease's state, location, and severity. However, the invasive nature and high cost of endoscopy make it unsuitable for frequent monitoring of disease activity in IBD patients, and even when it is possible to replace endoscopy with imaging, high cost remains a concern. Laboratory testing of blood or feces has the advantage of being non-invasive, rapid, cost-effective, and standardizable. Although the specificity and accuracy of laboratory testing alone need to be improved, it is increasingly used to monitor disease activity or to diagnose suspected IBD cases in combination with endoscopy and/or imaging. The literature survey indicates a dearth of summarization of biomarkers for IBD testing. This review introduces currently available non-invasive biomarkers of clinical importance in laboratory testing for IBD, and discusses the trends and challenges in the IBD biomarker studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.