ArticleBrain sciences2022
Dynamic Prediction of Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning.
Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic evaluation of predictive models for futile recanalization before thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- A Retrospective Machine Learning Analysis to Predict 3-Month Nonunion of Unstable Distal Clavicle Fracture Patients Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- The evolution of personalized stroke thrombectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Machine learning models integrating intracranial artery calcification to predict outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Dynamic, Interpretable, Machine Learning-Based Outcome Prediction as a New Emerging Opportunity in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Stroke research and treatment · 2025Article
- Static and temporal dynamic changes in brain activity in patients with post-stroke balance dysfunction: a pilot resting state fMRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Prediction of poststroke independent walking using machine learning: a retrospective study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration in Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Prediction of Hemorrhagic Complication after Thrombolytic Therapy Based on Multimodal Data from Multiple Centers: An Approach to Machine Learning and System Implementation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unfavorable outcome of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is related to clinical factors at multiple time points. However, predictive models used for dynamically predicting unfavorable outcomes using clinically relevant preoperative and postoperative time point variables have not been developed. Our goal was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for the dynamic prediction of unfavorable outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients with AIS who underwent a consecutive mechanical thrombectomy (MT) from three centers in China between January 2014 and December 2018. Based on the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, we used clinical characteristics on admission ("Admission" Model) and additional variables regarding intraoperative management and the postoperative National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score ("24-Hour" Model, "3-Day" Model and "Discharge" Model). The outcome was an unfavorable outcome at the three-month mark (modified Rankin scale, mRS 3-6: unfavorable). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier scores were the main evaluating indexes. The unfavorable outcome at the three-month mark was observed in 156 (62.0%) of 238 patients. These four models had a high accuracy in the range of 75.0% to 87.5% and had a good discrimination with AUC in the range of 0.824 to 0.945 on the testing set. The Brier scores of the four models ranged from 0.122 to 0.083 and showed a good predictive ability on the testing set. This is the first dynamic, preoperative and postoperative predictive model constructed for AIS patients who underwent MT, which is more accurate than the previous prediction model. The preoperative model could be used to predict the clinical outcome before MT and support the decision to perform MT, and the postoperative models would further improve the predictive accuracy of the clinical outcome after MT and timely adjust therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.