Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884740›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Real-World Implementation of Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

Helen Baldwin, Lion Loebel-Davidsohn, Dominic Oliver, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Daniel Stahl, Heleen Riper, Paolo Fusar-Poli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neuroimaging for precision medicine in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Helen BaldwinEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Lion Loebel-DavidsohnDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Dominic OliverEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-3407
Gonzalo Salazar de PabloEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6992-0767
Daniel StahlBiostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-6619
Heleen RiperDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8144-8901
Paolo Fusar-PoliEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
National Health Service · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Maudsley BRC Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant research progress surrounding precision medicine in psychiatry, there has been little tangible impact upon real-world clinical care.

objectiveTo identify barriers and facilitators affecting the real-world implementation of precision psychiatry.

methodA PRISMA-compliant systematic literature search of primary research studies, conducted in the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO and OpenGrey databases. We included a qualitative data synthesis structured according to the 'Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research' (CFIR) key constructs.

resultsOf 93,886 records screened, 28 studies were suitable for inclusion. The included studies reported 38 barriers and facilitators attributed to the CFIR constructs. Commonly reported barriers included: potential psychological harm to the service user (

conclusionsPsychiatry faces widespread challenges in the implementation of precision medicine methods. Innovative solutions are required at the level of the individual and the wider system to fulfil the translational gap and impact real-world care.

Indexed as

barriersfacilitatorsprecision medicinepsychiatryreal-world implementationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35884740
PMCPMC9313345
OpenAlexW4285732818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.