Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884669›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, Subtypes and 8-Year All-Cause Mortality in Aging Phenotypes: The Salus in Apulia Study.

Ilaria Bortone, Roberta Zupo, Fabio Castellana, Simona Aresta, Luisa Lampignano, Sabrina Sciarra, Chiara Griseta, Tommaso Antonio Stallone, Giancarlo Sborgia, Madia Lozupone and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. "Cognitive" Criteria in Older Adults With Slow Gait Speed: Implications for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ilaria BortoneUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4767-5334
Roberta ZupoUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9885-1185
Fabio CastellanaUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-8228
Simona ArestaUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-6578
Luisa LampignanoUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-3211
Sabrina SciarraUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Chiara GrisetaUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Tommaso Antonio StalloneGeneral Direction, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Giancarlo SborgiaEye Clinic, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Madia LozuponeDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-9724
Francesco PanzaDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-0656
Gianvito LagravineseClinical and Scientific Institutes Maugeri Pavia, Scientific Institute of Bari, IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-3071
Petronilla BattistaClinical and Scientific Institutes Maugeri Pavia, Scientific Institute of Bari, IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Rodolfo SardoneUnit of Research Methodology and Data Sciences for Population Health, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-1850

Funding

Ministero della Salute Aging Network of Italian Research Hospitals (IRCCS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to establish the key clinical features of different motoric cognitive risk (MCR) subtypes based on individual quantitative measures of cognitive impairment and to compare their predictive power on survival over an 8-year observation time. Methods: We analyzed data from a population-based study of 1138 subjects aged 65 years and older in south Italy. These individuals were targeted and allocated to subtypes of the MCR phenotype according to the slowness criterion plus one other different cognitive domain for each characterized phenotype (Subjective Cognitive Complaint [SCC]; Global Function [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) < 24]; or a combination of both). Clinical evaluation and laboratory assays, along with a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological and physical tests, completed the sample investigation. Results: MCR prevalence was found to be 9.8% (n = 112), 3.6% (n = 41), 3.4% (n = 39) and 1.8% (n = 21) for the MCR, MCR-GlobalFunction, MCR-StructuredSCC and MCR-SCC and GlobalFunction, respectively. Univariate Cox survival analysis showed an association only of the MCR-GlobalFunction subtype with an almost three-fold increased risk of overall death as compared to the other counterparts (HR 2.53, 95%CI 1.28 to 4.99) over an 8-year observation period. Using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) for clustered survival data, we found that MCR males had an increased and significant mortality risk with respect to MCR female subjects. Conclusions: MCR phenotypes assigned to the MMSE cognitive domain are more likely to have an increased risk of overall mortality, and gender showed a huge effect on the risk of death for MCR subjects over the 8-year observation.

Indexed as

assessmentcognitive impairmentfrailtygaitolder people

Identifiers

PMID35884669
PMCPMC9313038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.