Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884646›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Electroencephalography Findings in Older Adults Undergoing Geriatric Treatment: A Surrogate for the Outcome?

Marco Meyer, Stefanie Schmetsdorf, Thomas Stein, Ulrich Niemöller, Andreas Arnold, Patrick Schramm, Josef Rosenbauer, Karel Kostev, Christian Tanislav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco MeyerDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-252X
Stefanie SchmetsdorfDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.
Thomas SteinDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.
Ulrich NiemöllerDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.
Andreas ArnoldDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.
Patrick SchrammDepartment of Neurology, Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-6708
Josef RosenbauerDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.
Karel KostevEpidemiology, IQVIA, 60549 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2124-7227
Christian TanislavDepartment of Geriatrics and Neurology, Diakonie Hospital Jung Stilling Siegen, 57080 Siegen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) is a multidisciplinary approach developed to meet the needs of older patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides valuable information for monitoring the cerebral function. As a surrogate, EEG findings may help to estimate the course of diseases as well as the treatment outcomes. Objectives: Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate EEG findings in older patients receiving CGC. Methods: Patients with an initial EEG in a geriatric unit between May 2019 and April 2020 and treated using the CGC approach were analyzed. EEG abnormalities were defined as generalized (diffuse) background slowing and/or intermittent/persistent focal slowing and/or epileptiform discharges. Assessment results for the Barthel index (BI), Tinetti Balance and Gait test (TBGT), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were analyzed in relation to the presence of EEG abnormalities. Results: The study included 398 patients (mean age: 83.0 ± 6.57 years, 69.3% were female). Abnormal EEG patterns were found in 94 (23.6%) patients. Patients with EEG abnormalities had a mean age of 83.4 years versus a mean of 82.8 years in those without (p = 0.451). Based on all calculated scores, the majority of the patients improved after CGC, with a tendency to higher-grade improvements in those without EEG abnormalities (BI: 86.2% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.024; TUG: 53.3% vs. 31.9%, p < 0.001); for TBGT, only a gradual difference was detected (TBGT: 79.9% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.088). The presence of EEG abnormalities was associated with the parameters dementia (36.2% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.010), known epilepsy/seizure (19.1% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.001), structural brain lesion (47.9% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001), and delirium (9.6% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.030) during hospitalization. Conclusions: We found EEG abnormalities in almost a quarter of the patients treated in the geriatric unit. In older patients, the presence of EEG abnormalities is associated with lower improvements after CGC.

Indexed as

comprehensive geriatric careEEGolder patients

Identifiers

PMID35884646
PMCPMC9312893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.