Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884617›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Evaluation of the Perioperative and Postoperative Course of Surgery for Pineal Germinoma in the SIOP CNS GCT 96 Trial.

Ehab Shabo, Thomas Czech, James C Nicholson, Conor Mallucci, Carmine Mottolese, Gianluca Piatelli, Didier Frappaz, Matthew Jonathan Murray, Cecile Faure-Conter, Maria Luisa Garrè and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ehab ShaboDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Thomas CzechDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-2795
James C NicholsonDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-0199
Conor MallucciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool L14 5AB, UK.
Carmine MottoleseNeurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Université de Lyon, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France.
Gianluca PiatelliDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital, 16147 Genvoa, Italy.
Didier FrappazDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, 69008 Lyon, France.
Matthew Jonathan MurrayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool L14 5AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-1147
Cecile Faure-ConterDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, 69008 Lyon, France.
Maria Luisa GarrèDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genova, Italy.
Sevgi Sarikaya-SeiwertSection of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische, Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Leonie WeinholdDepartment of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-9427
Hannes HaberlSection of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Rheinische, Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele CalaminusDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7893-7982
Institut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CNS germinoma, being marker-negative, are mainly diagnosed by histological examination. These tumors predominantly appear in the suprasellar and/or pineal region. In contrast to the suprasellar region, where biopsy is the standard procedure in case of a suspected germ-cell tumor to avoid mutilation to the endocrine structures, pineal tumors are more accessible to primary resection. We evaluated the perioperative course of patients with pineal germinoma who were diagnosed by primary biopsy or resection in the SIOP CNS GCT 96 trial. Methods: Overall, 235 patients had germinoma, with pineal localization in 113. The relationship between initial symptoms, tumor size, and postoperative complications was analyzed. Results: Of 111 evaluable patients, initial symptoms were headache (n = 98), hydrocephalus (n = 93), double vision (n = 62), Parinaud syndrome (n = 57), and papilledema (n = 44). There was no significant relationship between tumor size and primary symptoms. A total of 57 patients underwent primary resection and 54 underwent biopsy. Postoperative complications were reported in 43.2% of patients after resection and in 11.4% after biopsy (p < 0.008). Biopsy was significantly more commonly performed on larger tumors (p= 0.002). Conclusions: These results support the practice of biopsy over resection for histological confirmation of pineal germinoma.

Indexed as

biopsyperioperative coursepineal germinomaresectionSIOP CNS GCT 96 trial

Identifiers

PMID35884617
PMCPMC9323477
OpenAlexW4286433450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.