Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884590›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Chemotherapy Shows a Better Efficacy Than Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with a Heterogeneous Estrogen Receptor Expression Assessed by

Yizhao Xie, Xinyue Du, Yannan Zhao, Chengcheng Gong, Shihui Hu, Shuhui You, Shaoli Song, Xichun Hu, Zhongyi Yang, Biyun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-Head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Real-world application ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Case report:Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yizhao XieDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xinyue DuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yannan ZhaoDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Chengcheng GongDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shihui HuDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shuhui YouDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xichun HuDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhongyi YangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6195-9942
Biyun WangDepartment of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7829-1544
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The heterogeneity of estrogen receptor (ER) expression has long been a challenge for the diagnosis and treatment strategy of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A novel convenient method of ER detection using 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FES PET/CT) offers a chance to screen and analyze MBC patients with ER uncertainty. Methods: MBC patients who received 18F-FES PET/CT were screened and patients with both FES positive (FES+) and negative (FES-) lesions were enrolled in this study. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan−Meier method and was compared using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 635 patients were screened and 75 of 635 (11.8%) patients showed ER uncertainty; 51 patients received further treatment and were enrolled in this study. Among them, 20 (39.2%) patients received chemotherapy (CT), 21 (41.2%) patients received endocrine-based therapy (ET), and 10 (19.6%) patients received combined therapy (CT + ET). CT showed a better progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ET (mPFS 7.1 vs. 4.6 months, HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20−0.93, p = 0.03). CT + ET did not improve PFS compared with either CT or ET alone (mPFS 4.4 months, p > 0.2). All three treatment options were well tolerated. Conclusions: 18F-FES PET/CT could identify patients with ER heterogeneity. Patients with bone metastasis are more likely to have ER heterogeneity. Patients with ER heterogeneity showed better sensitivity to CT rather than ET. Combined therapy of CT + ET did not improve the treatment outcome.

Indexed as

18F-FES PET/CTbreast cancerdiagnosisER heterogeneitytreatment pattern

Identifiers

PMID35884590
PMCPMC9323202
OpenAlexW4286007857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.