Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884578›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Evaluation of a Deep Learning Approach to Differentiate Bowen's Disease and Seborrheic Keratosis.

Philipp Jansen, Daniel Otero Baguer, Nicole Duschner, Jean Le'Clerc Arrastia, Maximilian Schmidt, Bettina Wiepjes, Dirk Schadendorf, Eva Hadaschik, Peter Maass, Jörg Schaller and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philipp JansenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-2118
Daniel Otero BaguerCenter for Industrial Mathematics (ZeTeM), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6550-6043
Nicole DuschnerDermatopathologie Duisburg Essen GmbH, 45329 Essen, Germany.
Jean Le'Clerc ArrastiaCenter for Industrial Mathematics (ZeTeM), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Maximilian SchmidtCenter for Industrial Mathematics (ZeTeM), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-1389
Bettina WiepjesDermatopathologie Duisburg Essen GmbH, 45329 Essen, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Eva HadaschikDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Peter MaassCenter for Industrial Mathematics (ZeTeM), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Jörg SchallerDermatopathologie Duisburg Essen GmbH, 45329 Essen, Germany.
Klaus Georg GriewankDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-9449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Some of the most common cutaneous neoplasms are Bowen’s disease and seborrheic keratosis, a malignant and a benign proliferation, respectively. These entities represent a significant fraction of a dermatopathologists’ workload, and in some cases, histological differentiation may be challenging. The potential of deep learning networks to distinguish these diseases is assessed. Methods: In total, 1935 whole-slide images from three institutions were scanned on two different slide scanners. A U-Net-based segmentation deep learning algorithm was trained on data from one of the centers to differentiate Bowen’s disease, seborrheic keratosis, and normal tissue, learning from annotations performed by dermatopathologists. Optimal thresholds for the class distinction of diagnoses were extracted and assessed on a test set with data from all three institutions. Results: We aimed to diagnose Bowen’s diseases with the highest sensitivity. A good performance was observed across all three centers, underlining the model’s robustness. In one of the centers, the distinction between Bowen’s disease and all other diagnoses was achieved with an AUC of 0.9858 and a sensitivity of 0.9511. Seborrheic keratosis was detected with an AUC of 0.9764 and a sensitivity of 0.9394. Nevertheless, distinguishing irritated seborrheic keratosis from Bowen’s disease remained challenging. Conclusions: Bowen’s disease and seborrheic keratosis could be correctly identified by the evaluated deep learning model on test sets from three different centers, two of which were not involved in training, and AUC scores > 0.97 were obtained. The method proved robust to changes in the staining solution and scanner model. We believe this demonstrates that deep learning algorithms can aid in clinical routine; however, the results should be confirmed by qualified histopathologists.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBowen’s diseasecomputer-aided diagnosis (CAD)digital pathologyseborrheic keratosisU-Netwhole-slide image (WSI)

Identifiers

PMID35884578
PMCPMC9320483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.