Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35884484›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Definition of an Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model for the Inner Ear in Definitive Radiochemotherapy of Nasopharynx Carcinoma.

Leonie Peuker, Daniel Rolf, Michael Oertel, Alexander Peuker, Sergiu Scobioala, Dominik Hering, Claudia Rudack, Uwe Haverkamp, Hans Theodor Eich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Survival and patterns of recurrence in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma from a non-endemic region-A German multicenter analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonie PeukerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Daniel RolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7733-6854
Michael OertelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2786-7013
Alexander PeukerInstitute of Flight Guidance, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Sergiu ScobioalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Dominik HeringDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-1859
Claudia RudackDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Uwe HaverkampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Hans Theodor EichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Definitive radiochemotherapy is the treatment of choice for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the vicinity of the nasopharynx to the inner ear and the use of ototoxic platinum-based chemotherapy, there is a risk for irreversible damage to the auditory system. To avoid or minimize these critical side effects, radiation exposure to each inner ear must be balanced between target volume coverage and toxicity. However, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of the inner ear validated by clinical data are rare. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigates the inner ear toxicity of 46 patients who received radio(chemo-)therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at our institution from 2004 to 2021 according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria. For each inner ear, the mean (Dmean) and maximum (Dmax) dose in Gray (Gy) was evaluated and correlated with clinical toxicity data. Based on the data, an NTCP model and a cutoff dose logistic regression model (CDLR) were created. Results: In 11 patients (23.9%) hearing impairment and/or tinnitus was observed as a possible therapy-associated toxicity. Dmean was between 15−60 Gy, whereas Dmax was between 30−75 Gy. There was a dose-dependent, sigmoidal relation between inner ear dose and toxicity. A Dmean of 44 Gy and 65 Gy was associated with inner ear damage in 25% and 50% of patients, respectively. The maximum curve slope (m) was found at 50% and is m=0.013. The Dmax values showed a 25% and 50% complication probability at 58 Gy and 69 Gy, respectively, and a maximum slope of the sigmoid curve at 50% with m=0.025. Conclusion: There is a sigmoidal relation between radiation dose and incidence of inner ear toxicities. Dose constraints for the inner ear of <44 Gy (Dmean) or <58 Gy (Dmax) are suggested to limit the probability of inner ear toxicity <25%.

Indexed as

head and neck tumornasopharyngeal carcinomaNTCPradiotherapysurvivorshiptoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35884484
PMCPMC9320660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.