ArticleCancers2022
Optical Genome Mapping: A Promising New Tool to Assess Genomic Complexity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- To Treat or Not to Treat: Navigating Early-Stage CLL in the Era of Targeted Therapy.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Optical Genome Mapping Reveals Frequent Cryptic Structural Aberrations in Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Optical genome mapping improves detection and characterisation of cytogenetic abnormalities in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Leveraging a spectrum of cytogenomics methods for profiling complex karyotypes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Optical genome mapping reveals a recurrent translocation, t(14;16), in T/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia: report of two cases.Molecular cytogenetics · 2026Article
- Optical genome mapping as a high-resolution tool for uncovering cytogenetic complex and cryptic alterations in a cohort of patients with MDS and AML.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Optical genome mapping reveals complex cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Pilot evaluation of optical genome mapping in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: complementing FISH analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- The Use of Optical Genome Mapping for the Detection of Tyrosine Kinase Gene Fusions in Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Chromoanagenesis Detection in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Value of Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) for Diagnostics of Rare Diseases: A Family Case Report.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2024Article
- Genomic structural variants analysis in leukemia by a novel cytogenetic technique: Optical genome mapping.Cancer science · 2024Review
- Comparison of Optical Genome Mapping With Conventional Diagnostic Methods for Structural Variant Detection in Hematologic Malignancies.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Detection of Genomic Structural Variations Associated with Drug Sensitivity and Resistance in Acute Leukemia.Cancers · 2024Article
- Optical Genome Mapping: A Machine-Based Platform in Cytogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Novel treatments in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have generated interest regarding the clinical impact of genomic complexity, currently assessed by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Optical genome mapping (OGM), a novel technique based on imaging of long DNA molecules labeled at specific sites, allows the identification of multiple cytogenetic abnormalities in a single test. We aimed to determine whether OGM is a suitable alternative to cytogenomic assessment in CLL, especially focused on genomic complexity. Cytogenomic OGM aberrations from 42 patients were compared with CBA, FISH, and CMA information. Clinical−biological characteristics and time to first treatment (TTFT) were analyzed according to the complexity detected by OGM. Globally, OGM identified 90.3% of the known alterations (279/309). Discordances were mainly found in (peri-)centromeric or telomeric regions or subclonal aberrations (<15−20%). OGM underscored additional abnormalities, providing novel structural information on known aberrations in 55% of patients. Regarding genomic complexity, the number of OGM abnormalities had better accuracy in predicting TTFT than current methods (C-index: 0.696, 0.602, 0.661 by OGM, CBA, and CMA, respectively). A cut-off of ≥10 alterations defined a complex OGM group (C-OGM, n = 12), which included 11/14 patients with ≥5 abnormalities by CBA/CMA and one patient with chromothripsis (Kappa index = 0.778; p < 0.001). Moreover, C-OGM displayed enrichment of TP53 abnormalities (58.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) and a significantly shorter TTFT (median: 2 vs. 43 months, p = 0.014). OGM is a robust technology for implementation in the routine management of CLL patients, although further studies are required to define standard genomic complexity criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.