Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883975›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Scale among Adolescents in Ghana: Evidence-Based Assessment of the Internal and External Structure of the Measure.

Frank Quansah, John Elvis Hagan, Francis Ankomah, Edmond Kwesi Agormedah, Regina Mawusi Nugba, Medina Srem-Sai, Thomas Schack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frank QuansahDepartment of Educational Foundations, University of Education, Winneba P.O. Box 25, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-0939
John Elvis HaganDepartment of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 03321, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-3530-6133
Francis AnkomahDepartment of Education and Psychology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 03321, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-5750
Edmond Kwesi AgormedahDepartment of Business & Social Sciences Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 03321, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-4630-3520
Regina Mawusi NugbaDepartment of Education and Psychology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 03321, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-645X
Medina Srem-SaiDepartment of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Sports, University of Education, Winneba P.O. Box 25, Ghana.
Thomas SchackNeurocognition and Action-Biomechanics-Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Postfach 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
University of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of Education, Winneba · GHBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO-5 well-being measure happens to be one of the most renowned measures of subjective well-being across the globe. Although the instrument has been calibrated in different countries, its psychometric properties and applicability in Africa, especially in Ghana, are not known. In this study, the WHO-5 well-being scale was validated among adolescents in Ghana by assessing the validity evidence of the measure based on the internal and external structure. In particular, the study examined the (1) dimensionality of the WHO-5 well-being scale, (2) quality of the items (including the scale functioning) for the measure, and (3) criterion validity of the well-being measure. Using a survey approach, 997 adolescents were recruited in secondary schools across the northern belt of Ghana. The study found a one-factor structure of the scale, which supports the factor solution of the original measure. The items were found to be of high quality, except for one item. The WHO-5 well-being measure was found to have sufficient evidence regarding convergent and divergent validity. The outcome of this validation study provides support for the validity and reliability of the WHO-5 well-being scale's utility and use among adolescents in Ghana. The study encourages further validation studies to be conducted in Ghana to widen the reproducibility of the WHO-5 well-being measure.

Indexed as

adolescentsdepressiondistressGhanahealthsecondary schoolwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35883975
PMCPMC9323714
OpenAlexW4283776380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.