Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883464›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2022

Data Size and Quality Matter: Generating Physically-Realistic Distance Maps of Protein Tertiary Structures.

Fardina Fathmiul Alam, Amarda Shehu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome-Wide Identification of KiwifruitInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fardina Fathmiul AlamDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5660-6840
Amarda ShehuDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-4610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the debut of AlphaFold2, we now can get a highly-accurate view of a reasonable equilibrium tertiary structure of a protein molecule. Yet, a single-structure view is insufficient and does not account for the high structural plasticity of protein molecules. Obtaining a multi-structure view of a protein molecule continues to be an outstanding challenge in computational structural biology. In tandem with methods formulated under the umbrella of stochastic optimization, we are now seeing rapid advances in the capabilities of methods based on deep learning. In recent work, we advance the capability of these models to learn from experimentally-available tertiary structures of protein molecules of varying lengths. In this work, we elucidate the important role of the composition of the training dataset on the neural network's ability to learn key local and distal patterns in tertiary structures. To make such patterns visible to the network, we utilize a contact map-based representation of protein tertiary structure. We show interesting relationships between data size, quality, and composition on the ability of latent variable models to learn key patterns of tertiary structure. In addition, we present a disentangled latent variable model which improves upon the state-of-the-art variable autoencoder-based model in key, physically-realistic structural patterns. We believe this work opens up further avenues of research on deep learning-based models for computing multi-structure views of protein molecules.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsModels, TheoreticalProteinsdisentanglementgenerative modelmulti-structure viewprotein moleculespatial pyramidal poolingtertiary structuretraining set configurationvariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID35883464
PMCPMC9313347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.