ArticleBiomolecules2022
Ventricular Repolarization and Calcium Transient Show Resonant Behavior under Oscillatory Pacing Rate.
Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The electrical restitution of the non-propagated cardiac ventricular action potential.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac EC coupling is triggered by rhythmic depolarizing current fronts originating from the sino-atrial node, and the way variability in rhythm is associated with variability in action potential duration (APD) and, in turn, in the variability of calcium transient amplitude (CTA) and contraction is a key determinant of beating stability. Sinusoidal-varying pacing rate is adopted here in order to establish whether APD and CTA oscillations, elicited in a human ventricular AP model (OR) under oscillatory pacing, are consistent with the dynamics of two coupled harmonic oscillators, e.g., a two-degree-of-freedom system of mass and springs (MS model). I show evidence that this is the case, and that the MS model, preliminarily fitted to OR behavior, retains key features of the physiological system, such as the dependence of APD and CTA oscillation amplitudes from average value and from beat-to-beat changes in pacing rate, and the phase relationship between them. The bi-directionality of coupling between APD and CTA makes it difficult to discriminate which one leads EC coupling dynamics under variable pacing. The MS model suggests that the calcium cycling, with its greater inertia chiefly determined by the SR calcium release, is the leading mechanism. I propose the present approach to also be relevant at the whole organ level, where the need of compact representations of electromechanical interaction, particularly in clinical practice, remains urgent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.