Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883407›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Evaluating Potential Cetacean Welfare Indicators from Video of Live Stranded Long-Finned Pilot Whales (

Rebecca M Boys, Ngaio J Beausoleil, Matthew D M Pawley, Emma L Betty, Karen A Stockin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physical Measures of Welfare in Fin (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rethinking the utility of the Five Domains model.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca M BoysCetacean Ecology Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-800X
Ngaio J BeausoleilAnimal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4592-0460
Matthew D M PawleySchool of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Emma L BettyCetacean Ecology Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-1957
Karen A StockinCetacean Ecology Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2981-3983
Massey University · NZ

Funding

Animal Behavior Society Amy R Samuels GrantAnimal Ethics Inc. USA Research GrantAssociation of Commonwealth Universities Doctoral ScholarshipGoPro (United States) Equipment supportNew Zealand Veterinary Association Marion Cunningham Memorial Fund GrantRoyal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Discovery FellowshipWildbase Research Trust, New Zealand Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the known benefit of considering welfare within wildlife conservation and management, there remains a lack of data to inform such evaluations. To assess animal welfare, relevant information must be captured scientifically and systematically. A key first step is identifying potential indicators of welfare and the practicality of their measurement. We assessed the feasibility of evaluating potential welfare indicators from opportunistically gathered video footage of four stranded odontocete species (n = 53) at 14 stranding events around New Zealand. The first stranded cetacean ethogram was compiled, including 30 different behaviours, 20 of which were observed in all four species. Additionally, thirteen types of human intervention were classified. A subset of 49 live stranded long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas edwardii) were assessed to determine indicator prevalence and to quantify behaviours. Four ‘welfare status’ and six ‘welfare alerting’ non-behavioural indicators could be consistently evaluated from the footage. Additionally, two composite behavioural indicators were feasible. Three human intervention types (present, watering, and touching) and five animal behaviours (tail flutter, dorsal fin flutter, head lift, tail lift, and head side-to-side) were prevalent (>40% of individuals). Our study highlights the potential for non-invasive, remote assessments via video footage and represents an initial step towards developing a systematic, holistic welfare assessment framework for stranded cetaceans.

Indexed as

animal welfare assessmentbehaviourcetaceanhuman interventionmanagementmarine mammalstrandingwildlife

Identifiers

PMID35883407
PMCPMC9312325
OpenAlexW4286491577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.