Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883380›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of Dietary Amylose-Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide.

Min Wang, Can Yang, Qiye Wang, Jianzhong Li, Yali Li, Xueqin Ding, Pengfei Huang, Huansheng Yang, Yulong Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min WangHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Can YangHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-6994
Qiye WangHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-2341
Jianzhong LiHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Yali LiHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Xueqin DingHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Pengfei HuangHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-3867
Huansheng YangHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Yulong YinHunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hu-nan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Hunan Normal University · CNHengyang Normal University · CN

Funding

Key Programs of Frontier Scientific Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences QYZDY-SSW-SMC008Research foundation of the Education of Hunan Province (18B374) and China postdoctoral science foundation funded project 2016M600630the Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Foundation of HuNan Province 2016JC2034the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2017JJ1020the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST YESS20160086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of diet with different amylose−amylopectin ratios (AAR) on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities and mRNA expression of nutrients transporters in piglets with short-term lipopolysaccharide (LPS) intraperitoneal injections. Sixty 21 days-old piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire; 6.504 ± 0.079) were randomly assigned based on their body weight (BW) and litters of origins to five groups with experimental diets with an AAR of 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, or 0.80 (namely, the 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, and 0.80 groups), respectively. Each treatment included 12 piglets (one piglet per pen). This experiment lasted for 28 days. On the 28th day, six piglets in each treatment were randomly selected for an LPS intraperitoneal injection (100 μg/kg BW), and other piglets were injected with normal saline. Twelve hours after LPS injection, all piglets were sacrificed to collect small intestinal mucosa for analysis. Although different AAR did not influence the final BW in piglets, the piglets in the 0.40 group represented the poorest feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) in the first, second and fourth week (p < 0.05) and the lowest average daily gain (ADG) in the fourth week (p < 0.05) compared with other groups. In terms of the small intestinal morphology, piglets in the 0.20 and 0.60 groups showed better ileal villous width (p < 0.05). Piglets in the 0.60 group presented greater activities of jejunal maltase, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05) than those of 0.20 and 0.40. However, a low amylose diet increased the mRNA expression of jejunal glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05). In addition, compared to saline injection, the LPS challenge significantly lessened jejunal digestive enzyme activities (p < 0.01) and, ileal villous width and downregulated the gene expression of glucose and amino acid transporters (p < 0.05) in piglets. Interestingly, certain diet -LPS interactions on duodenal VH/CD, jejunal maltase activity (p < 0.05) and the expression of glucose transporters (p < 0.05) were observed. Taken together, in terms of small intestinal digestion and absorption capacity, these results demonstrated that a diet with an AAR of 0.60 diets could improve the intestinal digestive and absorptive capability by affecting small intestinal morphology, digestive enzymes, and nutrients absorptions in piglets. In addition, the diets containing an AAR of 0.40−0.60 were more likely to resist the damage of LPS stress to intestinal morphology and nutrient absorption.

Indexed as

amylose–amylopectingrowth performanceintestinal digestion and absorptionLPSweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID35883380
PMCPMC9311517
OpenAlexW4285796668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.