New Evidence of Tiger Subspecies Differentiation and Environmental Adaptation: Comparison of the Whole Genomes of the Amur Tiger and the South China Tiger.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Genome-wide scan for selection signatures reveals novel insights into the adaptive capacity characteristics in three Chinese cattle breeds.BMC genomics · 2025
   Article
2. Revealing Amur tiger family pedigrees based on age identification using fecal microbiome and kinship analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
   Article
3. Population genomic analysis provides evidence of the past success and future potential of South China tiger captive conservation.BMC biology · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as