Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883334›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effect of Vaccination against

Ricardo Sant'Anna da Costa, Maria Isabel N Di Azevedo, Ana Luiza Dos Santos Baptista Borges, Luíza Aymée, Gabriel Martins, Walter Lilenbaum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FiveMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seroprevalence and Molecular Epidemiology ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Diagnostic Pathways ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Epidemiology of PathogenicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparison of the PF07598-Encoded Virulence-Modifying Proteins ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo Sant'Anna da CostaLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil.
Maria Isabel N Di AzevedoLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Dos Santos Baptista BorgesLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil.
Luíza AyméeLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-5775
Gabriel MartinsCentro Universitário Arthur Sá Earp Neto, Petrópolis 25680-120, Brazil.
Walter LilenbaumLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Vaccination of dogs against leptospirosis is of paramount importance, as they ideally must provide not only long-term protection, but also against the renal carrier state of leptospires. This study assessed the post-vaccine humoral response against Leptospira in naturally exposed dogs and effects on renal carrier status. (2) Methods: A total of 118 dogs were studied for 365 days, separated into Group A (vaccinated, n = 94) and Group B (non-vaccinated, n = 24). Group A was subdivided into three groups: A1 with 32 dogs immunized with the vaccine #1; A2 by 32 dogs with #2; and A3 30 dogs with #3. Serology (MAT and IgG-ELISA) and urinary PCR were conducted. (3) Results: Seroreactivity increased at D15 post-vaccination and, regardless of vaccine brand, remained high up to D180, with antibody switch to IgG after D30. A total of 46.8% of animals from Group A were PCR-positive at least once, in contrast to 75% in Group B, regardless of vaccine brand (p < 0.05; OR: 0.3). (4) Conclusions: All commercial vaccines succeeded at eliciting a long-term IgG-based response and were partially effective at protecting against kidney infection.

Indexed as

animal hostcanine leptospirosiscommercial vaccineleptospiral infectionsequencingsilent infectionsubclinical infection

Identifiers

PMID35883334
PMCPMC9311912
OpenAlexW4285089751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.