Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883325›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of the Probiotic,

Jiayuan Mo, Yujie Lu, Shan Jiang, Gang Yan, Tianqi Xing, Di Xu, Yaoyin He, Bingkun Xie, Ganqiu Lan, Baojian Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayuan MoCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Yujie LuCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Shan JiangCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Gang YanCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Tianqi XingCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Di XuCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Yaoyin HeCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Bingkun XieCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Ganqiu LanCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Baojian ChenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Livestock Genetic Improvement, The Animal Husbandry Research Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530004, China.
Jing LiangCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5533-2107
Guangxi University · CNGuangxi Veterinary Research Institute · CN

Funding

Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2018GXNSFBA281105National modern agricultural industrial technology system nycytxgxcxtd-15-01Special Project on Innovation Driven Development of Guangxi Guike-AA17204029Special Project on Innovation Driven Development of Guangxi Guike-AA18118050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (LDB) is an approved feed additive on the Chinese ‘Approved Feed Additives’ list. However, the possibility of LDB as an antibiotic replacement remains unclear. Particularly, the effect of LDB on microbiota and metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) requires further explanation. This study aimed to identify the microbiota and metabolites present in fecal samples and investigate the relationship between the microbiota and metabolites to evaluate the potential of LDB as an antibiotic replacement in pig production. A total of 42 female growing-finishing pigs were randomly allocated into the antibiotic group (basal diet + 75 mg/kg aureomycin) and LDB (basal diet + 3.0 × 109 cfu/kg LDB) groups. Fecal samples were collected on days 0 and 30. Growth performance was recorded and assessed. 16S rRNA sequencing and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based non-targeted metabolomics approaches were used to analyze the differences in microbiota and metabolites. Associations between the differences were calculated using Spearman correlations with the Benjamini−Hochberg adjustment. The LDB diet had no adverse effect on feed efficiency but slightly enhanced the average daily weight gain and average daily feed intake (p > 0.05). The diet supplemented with LDB increased Lactobacillus abundance and decreased that of Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group spp. Dietary-supplemented LDB enhanced the concentrations of pyridoxine, tyramine, D-(+)-pyroglutamic acid, hypoxanthine, putrescine and 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid and decreased the lithocholic acid concentration. The Lactobacillus networks (Lactobacillus, Peptococcus, Ruminococcaceae_UCG-004, Escherichia-Shigella, acetophenone, tyramine, putrescine, N-methylisopelletierine, N1-acetylspermine) and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group networks (Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group, Treponema_2, monolaurin, penciclovir, N-(5-acetamidopentyl)acetamide, glycerol 3-phosphate) were the most important in the LDB effect on pig GIT health in our study. These findings indicate that LDB may regulate GIT function through the Lactobacillus and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group networks. However, our results were restrained to fecal samples of female growing-finishing pigs; gender, growth stages, breeds and other factors should be considered to comprehensively assess LDB as an antibiotic replacement in pig production.

Indexed as

co-occurrence networkgastrointestinal tractLactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricusmetabolitesmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID35883325
PMCPMC9311557
OpenAlexW4285043870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.