Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883299›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of Different Concentrations of

Yanchen Zhu, Haoming Xiong, Zhiying Wen, Hanchen Tian, Yiye Chen, Longfei Wu, Yongqing Guo, Baoli Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synergistic effects ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fermentation Characteristics, Nutrient Content, and Microbial Population ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. The Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of different concentrations ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  18. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Ensiling hybridFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanchen ZhuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Haoming XiongCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhiying WenCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hanchen TianCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yiye ChenCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Longfei WuCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yongqing GuoCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Baoli SunCollege of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Basic andApplied Basic Research Foundation of China 2019B1515210020Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2019B110209005Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System of Guangdong Province 2022KJ127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the experiment was to study the effects of different concentrations of Lactobacillus plantarum (LP) and Bacillus licheniformis (BL) on the quality of hybrid Pennisetum (HP) silage. The experiment consisted of five treatment groups. The control group did not use additives, and the experimental groups were added with LP or BL of 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh weight (FW) and 1 × 107 cfu/g FW, respectively. The results showed that LP and BL could increase the in vitro fermentation gas production and reduce the ammonia nitrogen (AN) content in HP silage. Water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), lactic acid (LA) content, and gas production in the LP group were positively correlated with LP addition, and acetic acid (AA) was negatively correlated with addition. The content of WSC and LA in the LP7 group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05), and AA was lower than that in the control group (p > 0.05). Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), and gas production were negatively correlated with the addition of BL, while acid detergent fiber (ADF) content was positively correlated with the addition of BL. Furthermore, in the above indicators, the BL5 group reached a significant level with the control group (p < 0.05). The results of 16sRNA showed that the use of LP and BL could increase the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and decrease the relative abundance of Weissella in HP silage compared with the control group. In conclusion, LP and BL can significantly improve the quality of HP silage. The LP7 group and the BL5 group have the best silage effect. From the perspective of gas production in in vitro fermentation, the LP7 group had stronger fermentability and higher nutritional value.

Indexed as

Bacillus licheniformishybrid PennisetumLactobacillus plantarumsilage

Identifiers

PMID35883299
PMCPMC9311531
OpenAlexW4284893926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.